”Taylor’s attorneys said the new policy against affiliations with violent extremist groups is “overbroad and viewpoint discriminatory.”“At all times, Mr Taylor has expressed his views with respect and civility,” they wrote in a court filing. Public interest doesn’t have a flavour of ideology to it; public interest is whether it benefits the public,” Kahn said.

“And, boy, have things evolved over the past five or six years.The judge described Taylor’s case as a “classic public interest lawsuit” and said it “goes to the heart of free speech principles that long precede our constitution,” according to a transcript of the hearing.Taylor’s lawyers argue access to Twitter is “essential for meaningful participation in modern-day American democracy.”A Twitter spokeswoman declined Friday to comment on the judge’s decision.A California judge has refused to throw out a lawsuit that accuses Twitter of violating the free speech rights of a leading white nationalist figure by banning his social media account.“And a bookstore, or a newspaper editor, or a cable platform has a First Amendment right to make good, bad, horrible decisions about who and who does not get to speak on its platform and what content does and does not get to be on its platform,” he said. “At no time did Mr Taylor or American Renaissance engage in insults, threats, or harassment, nor did they ever encourage anyone else to engage in such activity.The judge asked Carome if he was arguing Twitter has an “absolute First Amendment right” to remove anybody from its platform, including on the basis of their religion or gender.”

Taylor is a Yale-educated, self-described “race realist” who founded an Oakton, Virginia-based, tax-exempt non-profit called the New Century Foundation.Company attorney Patrick Carome argued that platforms like Twitter have a First Amendment editorial right to choose what kind of content to distribute.”Twitter says it has made numerous changes to its platform and policies to protect users from abuse and hateful images, including making it a terms-of-service violation for a user to be affiliated with a “violent extremist group.”“We may change those rules, as things evolve,” he told the judge. He operates American Renaissance, an online magazine that touts a philosophy that it’s “entirely normal” for whites to want to be a majority race.One of Taylor’s lawyers is Marc Randazza, who also represents neo-Nazi website publisher Andrew Anglin in a high-profile federal lawsuit brought by attorneys from the Southern Poverty Law Center.” Carome called that a “totally permissible, honourable rule for it to make.San Francisco Superior Court Judge Harold Kahn ruled in Jared Taylor’s favour during a hearing Thursday on Twitter’s request to dismiss the suit, court records show.“Twitter doesn’t do that,” Carome responded, “but that is what the First Amendment guarantees to First Amendment actors.

A Montana real estate agent sued Anglin last year for orchestrating an anti-Semitic online trolling campaign against her family.Taylor claims Twitter permanently suspended accounts belonging to him and polyurethane wheels Manufacturers hundreds of other far-right users in December based solely on their political views and affiliations.“Now, it may be speech that you and I don’t wish to enjoy, but that’s not germane to the determination of whether it’s public interest